On 2004-06-21, Simon Barner wrote:
> I see no problem using gcc 3.x for the ports collection, as long as you
> use it exclusively and don't mix it with the base gcc (libraries from
> those compilers are not always binary compatible, e.g. those compiled
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> from c++ sources).
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
This part is important. You cannot mix-and-match C++ code compiled
with different versions of gcc.
> AFAICS you should be able to build all those ports that are ready for
> FreeBSD 5.x (which has gcc 3.x as a system compiler).
gcc 3.4 is much stricter than gcc 3.3, and about 500 fewer ports are
currently buildable with it (including some "important" ones like
png).
Kris
>> Stay informed about: gcc3.4 for ports on FreeBSD 4.10-STABLE